The Best Memorial Day Fitness Tracker Deals 2025

If you need a comfortable, lightweight daily runner the Forerunner 165 feels great on small wrists and carries Garmin’s reliable GPS at $249.99, though it scored 6.5/10 in our testing. We found its straightforward design excellent for long wear, but heart rate readouts can be inconsistent during certain gym exercises and it lacks multisport features for triathletes. For solo runners who value comfort and basic GPS tracking it’s fine, but multisport athletes will want something more capable.

The Apple Watch SE is a dependable all-rounder that scored 7.5/10 in our review thanks to fast S8 performance and broad workout support at $299. We found its fitness tracking solid and responsive for everyday workouts, but during our testing it showed its limits—no ECG, no SpO2 monitoring, and only about 18 hours of battery with typical use. If you want smooth performance and app ecosystem access without premium health sensors, the SE is a sensible middle-ground choice.

The Fitbit Charge 6 bundled with Pixel Buds Pro shows promise with an improved heart rate algorithm, yet it only scored 5.5/10 in our testing because GPS performance and battery weren’t up to par. We found heart-rate accuracy better than prior models, but during our review built-in GPS frequently struggled and enabling always-on features noticeably cut battery life. If you prioritize accurate resting metrics and like Fitbit’s software, it’s okay; just don’t expect reliable route tracking on long runs.

Apple’s Watch Series 10 GPS is our top-rated choice in this guide, earning a 9/10 for advanced health features and tight ecosystem integration that make tracking feel effortless. In our testing we found the lightweight design and superior screen readability keep it comfortable and easy to use all day, and additions like sleep apnea detection broaden its wellness offerings. During our review battery life was modest at about 18 hours and the Blood Oxygen app is currently disabled due to a legal dispute, so our experience shows you’ll likely need to charge nightly despite excellent on-device tracking.

Polar Ignite 3 Titanium impresses with a vibrant AMOLED display that's easy to read on the move, and in our testing the color and brightness were standout. During our review we found the interface sluggish—menus and notifications lag—and the lack of onboard music storage and contactless payments limits its smartwatch usefulness, which explains the 6/10 score. If you value clear visuals and accurate heart rate, sleep tracking and GPS with about five days of battery life, it’s a reasonable pick; power users should look elsewhere.

The WHOOP 4.0 is built for around-the-clock wear; in our testing it proved extremely comfortable and its sleep tracking was impressively accurate, which is why many athletes swear by it. During our review we found the lack of a display and built-in GPS limiting for runners who want instant on-device feedback, and the high subscription cost drags down its overall value—hence the 5.5/10 score. If you want minimal distraction and excellent recovery data with five-day battery life and IP68 water resistance, it’s worth considering; otherwise a smartwatch gives more features.

The Fitbit Inspire 3 is a straightforward, budget-friendly tracker (about $97) that in our testing delivered accurate heart rate monitoring and excellent comfort, earning a fair 6.5/10. We found its lightweight design perfect for 24/7 wear and sleep tracking, but its small display can be hard to read in bright sun and it lacks built-in GPS, so you’ll need your phone for outdoor route data. It’s a good choice if you want fuss-free tracking and long battery life without smartwatch bells and whistles.

Garmin’s Venu 3S earned an impressive 8.5/10 in our testing by balancing comfort, long battery life and deep health metrics, though it sits at a higher price point of $399.99. We found the watch lightweight for all-day wear and loved the comprehensive tracking—sleep, heart rate and stress—with up to 10 days of runtime in smartwatch mode keeping it reliable between charges. The trade-offs are a smaller third-party app selection and a proprietary charger, but if long battery and detailed health insights matter, this is one of our top picks.

The Withings ScanWatch 2 (42mm) leans dressier and in our testing scored 6/10 thanks to a clean, classic look and industry-leading 30-day battery life that keeps it on your wrist with minimal fuss. We found the FDA‑cleared ECG for atrial fibrillation detection to be a meaningful health asset, making it appealing for health-conscious users who prefer an analog aesthetic. During our review exercise heart-rate tracking proved less accurate at higher intensities, and our experience shows the lack of built-in GPS plus a small grayscale display make it a poor fit for runners who want detailed on-watch workout feedback.

Garmin’s fēnix 8 scored 8.5/10 in our testing thanks to its bright AMOLED display and long battery—our experience shows solid endurance for multi-day adventures, stretching to double-digit days with mixed GPS use. During review the built-in speaker and microphone made calls easy, but reported freezes and restarts during some workouts can lead to lost data. If battery life and on-wrist calling matter most, it’s one of our top-rated choices; just expect a fairly large, bulky watch on the wrist.

The Forerunner 970 is a feature-rich runner’s watch that scored 8/10 in our review, and in our testing its brilliantly bright AMOLED screen and integrated LED flashlight were genuinely useful for morning and night runs. We found the upgraded speaker and mic made voice calls and assistants practical, but our experience shows battery life can fall sharply at default brightness unless you dial it down. Also note the round-trip routing is buggy and advanced running metrics need an extra strap, so weigh those limits.

The COROS PACE 3 felt like a runner-first bargain in our testing—lightweight, comfortable, and packed with advanced running analytics that punch above its price, which helps justify its 7/10 score. During our review we appreciated the 15-day battery and accurate GPS tracking for training runs, but our experience shows limited smartwatch features and a plastic build make it feel less premium; music playback is basic MP3-only with no streaming. If you want focused running metrics and long battery life on a tight budget, this is an easy recommendation.

Garmin’s Instinct 3 (45 mm) scored 8/10 in our review and in our testing the vibrant AMOLED display and rugged construction made it ideal for outdoor adventures. We found the battery life impressive—up to 18 days in smartwatch mode—so you can go on extended trips without constant charging, but our experience shows the lack of a touchscreen and absence of speaker or microphone limits on-watch interactions like calls. Be mindful some users reported skin irritation after long wear, but if durability and battery matter most this is a strong pick.

Xiaomi’s Smart Band 9 Active is a bargain around $40; in our testing its 50+ sports modes and built-in GPS make it a versatile companion for casual workouts. During review we found real-world battery hovered around two weeks—short of the 18-day claim—and heart rate and sleep tracking can miss the mark, with heart rate deviations of 10–20 BPM versus clinical equipment, which helps explain the 6.5/10 score. For the price it’s great for basics; accuracy-seeking athletes should look higher.

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is a lightweight fitness band that in our testing delivered comfortable all-day wear and an excellent battery—our experience shows you can get up to about 13 days between charges, making it reliable on trips. During review we liked the more than 100 workout modes for diverse training, but it lacks built-in GPS and only works with Android devices, which limits its appeal; the screen also scratches easily so we recommend a protector. Scoring 7.5/10, it’s a strong value for Android users who want long battery life.

The Amazfit Band 7 is a budget-friendly option under $50 that in our testing impressed with long battery life—our experience shows around 18 days of typical use—and support for over 120 sports modes for varied workouts. During review we noted that it lacks built-in GPS and heart-rate tracking can be less accurate during intense exercise, and turning on the always-on display noticeably cuts battery life. With a 7/10 score it’s a solid value if you want many sport profiles and long runtime, but serious tracking needs are better met elsewhere.

If you want a stylish, lightweight tracker for small wrists, the Lily 2 Classic is an attractive option at $249.99, though it earned a modest 6/10 in our testing. We found the elegant design and five-day battery pleasant for everyday wear, but the touch display can be unresponsive and it lacks built-in GPS, so it relies on your phone for accurate location. For casual users who prioritize looks and comfort over advanced tracking, it’s a reasonable pick.

The Amazfit Balance Smart Watch impressed us with a standout 14-day battery life and comprehensive health tracking at a budget-friendly price of about $143, which helps explain its strong 8/10 score. During our review we appreciated features like body composition analysis alongside heart rate and sleep monitoring, and the sleek, lightweight design makes it easy to wear all day. Be aware our experience shows limited third-party apps and some advanced functions require a paid subscription, and there’s no NFC for contactless payments.

Xiaomi's Smart Band 8 is the budget-friendly choice that in our testing delivers reliable heart-rate and sleep tracking with an impressive battery that can last up to 16 days. We found its $39 price and 5ATM water resistance make it a low-cost, low-maintenance option for everyday wear. During our review the lack of built-in GPS and a proprietary charger were clear downsides, and our experience shows the companion app is more limited than previous versions. Scoring 6.5/10, it’s best for users who want long runtime and basic health monitoring rather than advanced features.

Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Ultra earned one of the highest marks in our guide, scoring 9.5/10, and during our testing its advanced health suite—sleep apnea detection and body composition analysis—really stood out for users wanting deeper metrics. We found battery life impressively long for a fully featured smartwatch, about 60 hours with always-on display active (roughly 2.5 days),and the bold design turns heads, but size and thickness can be uncomfortable on smaller wrists. If you want top-rated health tracking and long runtime and can afford it, this is our top pick.

The Venu X1 aims high with a stunning 2-inch AMOLED screen and support for over 100 workout types, but its $799.99 price and 7/10 score reflect real trade-offs we noticed during our review. In our testing the display and on-watch calling via the built-in speaker and mic shine, yet battery life suffers—about two days with always-on enabled—and the lack of multiband GPS can affect accuracy in tricky environments. Buy it if you want a premium look and advanced metrics and can live with shorter runtime.

The Fitbit Versa 4 is one of the better value picks at about $178, earning a solid 7.5/10 in our testing for its balanced feature set and long battery life. We found over 40 exercise modes and built-in GPS useful for outdoor runs, plus more than six days of battery keeps it on your wrist for extended periods. It’s held back by no third-party app support and no onboard music, so plan to bring your phone if you want streaming or playlists.

Samsung’s Galaxy Watch7 40mm looks great with a bright Super AMOLED display and scored 6.5/10 in our testing thanks to that vivid screen, but there are important downsides to consider. We found the display clarity excellent for outdoor visibility, yet battery life is limited—about 33 to 48 hours—so you’ll be charging nightly, and the charging process itself can take up to 100 minutes. It’s a solid choice if you want a sharp screen and Samsung integration, but not ideal for multi-day endurance use.

Garmin’s vivoactive 4S is a well-rounded mid-range smartwatch that in our testing earned a 7.5/10 for its comprehensive health suite — heart rate, sleep, stress and even hydration monitoring — plus built-in GPS for accurate outdoor tracking. We found up to seven days of battery life and 5 ATM water resistance make it practical for swimmers and weekend adventures. During our review the smaller 1.1-inch display felt cramped and music functionality can require a premium subscription, and the charging port sometimes needs careful adjustment to get a good connection.